Close Menu
AI News TodayAI News Today

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    Drizzle on top: a new high-end dog food brand is coming for the 1%

    Why the Steam Controller is (and isn’t) a big deal

    Jury selection in Musk v. Altman: ‘People don’t like him’

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo
    AI News TodayAI News Today
    • Home
    • Shop
    • AI News
    • AI Reviews
    • AI Tools
    • AI Tutorials
    • Chatbots
    • Free AI Tools
    AI News TodayAI News Today
    Home»AI Reviews»With new patch design, the Crew-13 astronauts clearly aren’t superstitious
    AI Reviews

    With new patch design, the Crew-13 astronauts clearly aren’t superstitious

    By No Comments3 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    montage of two emblems, one featuring a golden dragon at its center, the other three golden horses
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    It comes after 12

    The STS-13 crew, redesignated STS-41-C, created this patch that highlights superstitions and triskaidekaphobia.

    The STS-13 crew, redesignated STS-41-C, created this patch that highlights superstitions and triskaidekaphobia.


    Credit:

    collectSPACE.com


    Prior to Crew-13, NASA managers leaned into the superstition and devised a less intuitive but more data-driven designation that went into effect after the ninth space shuttle mission. Hence, what would have been STS-13 became STS-41-C, where the 4 was the fiscal year (1984), the 1 was the launch site (Kennedy Space Center in Florida), and C was the order of launch (C was the third planned flight of the year).

    “I mentioned it was 41-C that originally was STS-13, and my friend Jim Beggs, who was the administrator of NASA, had triskaidekaphobia, and he said, ‘There’s not going to be [another] Apollo 13 or a Shuttle 13, so come up with a new numbering system.’ So we did come up with this complex system for numbering the shuttles during that period of time,” said Bob Crippen, STS-41C commander, in a NASA oral history interview.

    NASA later reverted to a straightforward numerical designation after the loss of the space shuttle Challenger and the STS-51L crew in January 1986. As such, there was an STS-113, which launched aboard space shuttle Endeavour in 2002, but not before having to make late crew changes due to medical issues. The last time that NASA faced the same decision was on Apollo 13.

    “We were joking a lot about being number 113,” commander Ken Bowersox told the press at the time. He added that to play it safe, the mission patch used Roman numerals (CXIII).

    On board the International Space Station, the 13th crewed expedition began on April 1, 2006, 10 days before the 36th anniversary of the Apollo 13 launch.

    The Russian space program launched six crewed missions designated as number 13. At least one of those times, the head of the country’s space agency suggested it be skipped.

    “Many people have superstitious beliefs,” said Roscosmos director Anatoly Perminov, according to his press secretary, in 2008. “That’s why I think that it is a good idea to change the number of the next spaceship.”

    Despite the concern, Soyuz TMA-13 went forward as planned. As did Soyuz 13, Soyuz T-13, and Soyuz TM-13 before it.

    Soyuz TMA-13M launched Reid Wiseman, and Soyuz MS-13 landed with Christina Koch. Both US astronauts went on to fly aboard NASA’s Artemis II mission earlier this month, a crewed fly-by of the Moon that broke the distance record set by the Apollo 13 astronauts.

    arent astronauts Crew13 design patch superstitious
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleEU tells Google to open up AI on Android; Google says that’s “unwarranted intervention”
    Next Article Study: Infrasound likely a key factor in alleged hauntings
    • Website

    Related Posts

    AI Reviews

    Why the Steam Controller is (and isn’t) a big deal

    AI Reviews

    Social Media Scams Cost Americans $2.1 Billion in 2025

    AI Reviews

    Valve launches the Steam Controller without the Steam Machine

    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    Drizzle on top: a new high-end dog food brand is coming for the 1%

    0 Views

    Why the Steam Controller is (and isn’t) a big deal

    0 Views

    Jury selection in Musk v. Altman: ‘People don’t like him’

    0 Views
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    Latest Reviews
    AI Tutorials

    Quantization from the ground up

    AI Tools

    David Sacks is done as AI czar — here’s what he’s doing instead

    AI Reviews

    Judge sides with Anthropic to temporarily block the Pentagon’s ban

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest tech news from FooBar about tech, design and biz.

    Most Popular

    Drizzle on top: a new high-end dog food brand is coming for the 1%

    0 Views

    Why the Steam Controller is (and isn’t) a big deal

    0 Views

    Jury selection in Musk v. Altman: ‘People don’t like him’

    0 Views
    Our Picks

    Quantization from the ground up

    David Sacks is done as AI czar — here’s what he’s doing instead

    Judge sides with Anthropic to temporarily block the Pentagon’s ban

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer

    © 2026 ainewstoday.co. All rights reserved. Designed by DD.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.