Close Menu
AI News TodayAI News Today

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    We reviewed Valve’s new Steam Controller, ask us anything

    Study: Infrasound likely a key factor in alleged hauntings

    With new patch design, the Crew-13 astronauts clearly aren’t superstitious

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo
    AI News TodayAI News Today
    • Home
    • Shop
    • AI News
    • AI Reviews
    • AI Tools
    • AI Tutorials
    • Chatbots
    • Free AI Tools
    AI News TodayAI News Today
    Home»AI News»Put it in pencil: NASA’s Artemis III mission will launch no earlier than late 2027
    AI News

    Put it in pencil: NASA’s Artemis III mission will launch no earlier than late 2027

    By No Comments3 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Put it in pencil: NASA's Artemis III mission will launch no earlier than late 2027
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    Now, it’s looking more like late 2027, at the earliest, for Artemis III.

    “I’ve received responses from both vendors, both SpaceX and Blue Origin, to meet our needs for a late 2027 rendezvous, docking, and test of the interoperability of both landers in advance of a landing attempt in 2028,” Isaacman said Monday.

    Both companies have multibillion-dollar contracts to develop and deliver human-rated landers to NASA for use on Artemis missions. Both vehicles need to be refueled in space in order to fly to the Moon. This added complexity is not required for an Earth orbit mission.

    “The taxpayers are making a very big investment to both SpaceX and Blue Origin’s Human Landing System (HLS) capability,” Isaacman said in a hearing before the subcommittee of the House Appropriations Committee responsible for NASA’s budget. “I would also appreciate that both those companies are investing well in excess of that, as well.”

    Starship and Blue Moon are each significantly larger than the Apollo lunar lander, and could eventually be refueled at the Moon for multiple trips between the lunar surface and crew and cargo freighters in orbit.

    “It’s that capability that allows us not just to get back to the Moon, but really build the Moon base, put lots of mass, sufficiently and affordably, on the surface, not to mention every other application that comes from a rocket that you don’t have to throw away,” Isaacman said. “So we’re very grateful for that.”

    There are steep challenges in getting Starship and Blue Moon ready for a human spaceflight mission. On Apollo 9, two astronauts took the lunar module for a test run, separating from the command module with the mission’s third crew member for more than six hours before reconnecting in low-Earth orbit. For a similar test on Artemis III, Starship or Blue Moon would require an advanced, independent life support system, human-rated engines, a cockpit and flight controls, and a docking mechanism. SpaceX and Blue Origin have released few details of where those systems are in development and production.

    This artist’s rendering shows NASA’s Orion spacecraft docked with SpaceX’s Starship lunar lander near the Moon.

    Credit:
    NASA/SpaceX

    This artist’s rendering shows NASA’s Orion spacecraft docked with SpaceX’s Starship lunar lander near the Moon.


    Credit:

    NASA/SpaceX

    It’s possible NASA could go for a less ambitious Artemis III mission, with a rendezvous and docking but no independent crewed flight of the lunar lander. NASA’s leaders must decide on these options in the coming months, and their thinking will be informed by how quickly and successfully SpaceX moves forward with flying the next-generation Starship Version 3 rocket and Blue Origin’s planned uncrewed landing near the Moon’s south pole with the Blue Moon cargo lander.

    Artemis earlier III late Launch mission NASAs pencil put
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous Article9 Apple Watch Health Features That Fly Under the Radar, According to a Doctor at Apple
    Next Article Some Musk v. Altman Jurors Don’t Like Elon Musk
    • Website

    Related Posts

    AI News

    Study: Infrasound likely a key factor in alleged hauntings

    AI News

    Elon Musk and Sam Altman are going to court over OpenAI’s future

    AI News

    OpenAI ends its exclusive partnership with Microsoft

    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    We reviewed Valve’s new Steam Controller, ask us anything

    0 Views

    Study: Infrasound likely a key factor in alleged hauntings

    0 Views

    With new patch design, the Crew-13 astronauts clearly aren’t superstitious

    0 Views
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    Latest Reviews
    AI Tutorials

    Quantization from the ground up

    AI Tools

    David Sacks is done as AI czar — here’s what he’s doing instead

    AI Reviews

    Judge sides with Anthropic to temporarily block the Pentagon’s ban

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest tech news from FooBar about tech, design and biz.

    Most Popular

    We reviewed Valve’s new Steam Controller, ask us anything

    0 Views

    Study: Infrasound likely a key factor in alleged hauntings

    0 Views

    With new patch design, the Crew-13 astronauts clearly aren’t superstitious

    0 Views
    Our Picks

    Quantization from the ground up

    David Sacks is done as AI czar — here’s what he’s doing instead

    Judge sides with Anthropic to temporarily block the Pentagon’s ban

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer

    © 2026 ainewstoday.co. All rights reserved. Designed by DD.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.