Close Menu
AI News TodayAI News Today

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    The Moon’s shadow raced across the heart of Spain, and I was there to see it

    ‘Unprecedented’ number of Apple users received recent spyware alert, say investigators

    What Flock’s defenders are missing

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo
    AI News TodayAI News Today
    • Home
    • AI News
    • AI Reviews
    • AI Tools
    • AI Tutorials
    • Chatbots
    • Free AI Tools
    • Artificial Intelligence
    AI News TodayAI News Today
    Home»Chatbots»Supreme Court rejects Verizon bid for $47 million refund of FCC fine
    Chatbots

    Supreme Court rejects Verizon bid for $47 million refund of FCC fine

    By No Comments2 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Verizon logo on a screen displaying its stock price
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    Verizon claimed the privacy rules in Section 222 of the Communications Act cover only call-location data, and not device-location data. The 2nd Circuit disagreed, pointing to the law’s text stating that Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) includes data that is related to the location of a telecommunications service, and which is made available to the carrier “solely by virtue of the carrier-customer relationship.”

    “It thus qualifies as customer proprietary network information and triggers the privacy protections set forth in § 222 of the Communications Act,” the ruling said.

    The 2nd Circuit ruling described how Verizon sold location data to two aggregators, LocationSmart and Zumigo, “which in turn contracted with 63 third-party entities.” News reporting showed that Securus Technologies misused the program to let law enforcement officers access location data, and a Missouri sheriff “was able to access customer data with no legal process at all,” the ruling said.

    The major carriers have said they discontinued the data-sharing programs the fines related to, but still claim the fines were illegal. AT&T and T-Mobile still have hopes of getting rulings that would invalidate their fines.

    T-Mobile asked the Supreme Court to find that the location information protected under the law “refers only to call-location information, not other information about the location of a mobile device.”

    The 5th Circuit ruling in AT&T’s favor was decided solely on Seventh Amendment grounds and did not reach AT&T’s other arguments. After its Supreme Court loss, AT&T filed a brief urging the 5th Circuit to find that the customer data it sold is not protected by Section 222.

    An AT&T or T-Mobile victory could limit the ability of future FCC chairs to punish carriers for sales of device-location data. No such penalties are likely under the current administration. FCC Chairman Brendan Carr argued against the fines in 2024 when the commission was led by a Democratic majority, agreeing with carriers that only call location information is protected.

    bid court FCC fine million refund rejects Supreme Verizon
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleWhat Changed Was the Order
    Next Article What Flock’s defenders are missing
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Chatbots

    ‘Unprecedented’ number of Apple users received recent spyware alert, say investigators

    Chatbots

    Wordle meets Clippy in this new word game

    Chatbots

    Groq raises $350M to fuel its pivot from AI chips to neocloud

    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    The Moon’s shadow raced across the heart of Spain, and I was there to see it

    0 Views

    ‘Unprecedented’ number of Apple users received recent spyware alert, say investigators

    0 Views

    What Flock’s defenders are missing

    0 Views
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    Latest Reviews
    AI Tutorials

    Quantization from the ground up

    AI Tools

    David Sacks is done as AI czar — here’s what he’s doing instead

    AI Reviews

    Judge sides with Anthropic to temporarily block the Pentagon’s ban

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest tech news from FooBar about tech, design and biz.

    Most Popular

    The Moon’s shadow raced across the heart of Spain, and I was there to see it

    0 Views

    ‘Unprecedented’ number of Apple users received recent spyware alert, say investigators

    0 Views

    What Flock’s defenders are missing

    0 Views
    Our Picks

    Quantization from the ground up

    David Sacks is done as AI czar — here’s what he’s doing instead

    Judge sides with Anthropic to temporarily block the Pentagon’s ban

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer

    © 2026 ainewstoday.co. All rights reserved. Designed by DD.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.